SEND OBAMA BACK TO KENIA

SEND OBAMA BACK TO KENIA!

 

 

Ok, What way could I explain this racist comentary and try not to be bloody?

This guy is Ted´s father (Rafael Cruz) and is a reference in the life of his son Ted Cruz.

Rafael Cruz recently said in Texas that "Obama have to come back to Kenia" and "If we do not take this country back in this election, there's a very strong possibility that this country will be destroyed by Barack Obama in the next four years," he said.

First I want to analyze the curious situation of this man. He is an inmigrant, he came from Cuba, he didn´t know any english word when he came but he is a fervient believer and pro- tea party  (that includes to be against from inmigration).
How this guy finish with this thinkings?. Maybe to live in his teens in Cuba that is in the opposite way (politically speaking ) made him a narrow-minded?. I´m sure that this syndrome have a name in psycoterapy.

By other hand, Barack Obama can "destroy USA in four years with Obamacare?" This men have to be seen a lot of apocalyptic films...
 I think that France, Spain, China, Japón are a good example: "how to have a good social and public health care and not die trying". Is easy, because you will not be the first in trying... you only have to observe other countries, ask and adapt  whatever thing that can do more civilized and avanced your country.

The purpose of man is investigate, to be curious, try to change to better your life, to be more civilized (for that we go foward from prehistory to modern age)... that way we got to investigate the universe, to discover penicillin, to know what is a gene and how works , to know that the Earth goes around the Sun and not the opposite... all in this life have always riks but sometimes the benefits are more important that the possible risks.

The extrems are always bad... we can see a lot of examples in Germany, Spain, Cuba, China, Russia, Italy, and normally, when the mind is centered and not extrem, the society go foward and all works better.

8 PLACES THAT DO HEALTH CARE BETTER THAN US

8 places that do health care better than the US

I think is necessary that the goverment intervene in the health care of US because the pharmaceutical industry is very strong here and in reality they don´t look for you health and yes for earn money.

In Spain we have a universal health care that give you the secure that all that they do is the necessary and they no pretend to sell you things that reallity you don´t need. The  cancer treatments are free.

Of course we have to spend a percentage of our salary /month for the mantenance or health care but anyway is cheaper than in USA (maybe supposed 5% salary but all your family is in there).

The bad notice is that the health care in Spain have a long wait to see specialist and undergo certain procedures but is free and if is a emergency normally you don´t have to wait a lot.

By other way, the goverment subsideze most of the medication.

The past month I ask in Perimeter Clinic for necesary vaccines to go to Africa. They told me I need 3 vaccines and each is 200-300 $ and the insurance no cover this vaccines because is for a pleasure trip!!!

 In Spain my friend put this vaccines past month for about 16 euros all... surprised?

I will modify my trip and I will go to China and when I will go to Spain I will put my vaccines for Africa.

CHINA POLLUTION

Is China's pollution really getting worse?

 

 

Of course is getting worse. Pekin said that they are taken system for reduce the pollution but not in the way that advace other countries because "developed countries should limit their emissions further, having more decades contaminated during emerging nations"

 

That´s the way?, I think no.

 China have to be critic with himself and try seriusly to change his pollution dinamic and for me is a excuse to said that other countries before contaminated the Earth.

We know now the consequences of the climate change, so now is when we have to be united and do something good for the Earth.

All we have to try to be agree with Kioto Protocol and to be cautios, because is our future and our children´s future.

        Parties; Annex I & II countries with binding targets

        Parties; Developing countries without binding targets

        States not Party to the Protocol

        Signatory country with no intention to ratify the treaty, with no binding targets

        Countries that have denounced the Protocol, with no binding targets

        Parties with no binding targets in the second period, which previously had targets


WE DON´T HAVE A PLANET B TO LIVE


For more information about change climate you can visit :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=splKGWuErnM